Same Job, Different Office
advertisment
More in @WORK
back-up- City Cartoon: Rako & The Rat - Promotion
- A City on Edge
- Groundhog Day: Love It or Leave It
- If the Lift Had Eyes
- Keeping Up With the Metrosexuals
- From Board Room to Broom Closet
- From Investment Bank to the Wizard's Oz
- Banks, Bonus Tax & Zen
- The City Game of Snakes & Ladders
- Where Are All the City Girls?
Related Content
- Shocker: Office Drinking Can Lead to Office S.x (14/10/2007)
- Yoga in Your Office (25/10/2007)
- The Best Gyms Near Your Office (27/01/2008)
- S.x After Office Hours (16/07/2008)
- Monk and the Office Rottweiler (30/05/2008)
- This Job Terminates Here (02/12/2007)
It strikes me that in theory, being a stockbroker should have put me in much better stead for dealing with motherhood than mums-to-be from other career backgrounds. On close examination, there is a disarmingly alarming similarity in the required skill set and a shared goal of keeping the client (substitute baby) happy.
For starters, it's forever pressed upon new mums that they will have to embrace early mornings as their new best friend (with a note of superior sympathy from those already with children, and with a definite note of smug schadenfreude from those without). In reality, I now crawl out of bed at 07:00 most mornings, compared to the parallel world of my former existence, where I would be firmly ensconced at my desk by that time, feverishly tapping away at my computer, absorbing the overnight stock shocks and surprises in preparation for the daily 07:30 morning meeting. Frankly, dealing with the pandemonium that is baby breakfast (regurgitated milk, extricating baby porridge from hair, mini temper tantrums, etc.) is really not so different from a morning of sifting through the stock market shifts.
Then there are the clients. If you've ever watched the film Wall Street, being a stockbroker is nothing like that. There might be plenty of wannabe Gordon Gekkos, but for the vast majority, it's a desk job like any other - no overexcited hollering and fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants unscrupulous 'blue horse shoe' trade making. That's all pure artistic license Hollywood style. If anything, it's the clients, higher up on the food chain and on the other end of the phone, who make or break your day - and in a much more mundane way. These are the ones clutching the wallet and can choose to spend (or not) based on your stock recommendations. ("Might I suggest, sir, that today Stock X is looking mighty cheap, earnings were jolly buoyant at last count, and consolidation is rife in the sector, so it might get a boost from an imminent takeover, blah blah blah.") If they like it, you'll get an order, and the corresponding commission, and so forth.
The key to being a good stockbroker (and mother) is to pre-empt and meet your clients' (baby's) needs, thereby keeping them happy and your commission (mental state) healthy. So, it might go something like this: Is their portfolio a tad scant and needing some additions? Feed them a stock (substitute rusk, banana, rice cake or the like). Have they overloaded on risk and looking to scale back? Suggest they regurgitate a few stocks and help them deal with the mess (self-explanatory). Are they feeling grouchy and overtired? Stop hassling them and let them sleep. And so on. You get the picture.
So the irony is that despite a seeming role reversal, nothing has really changed. It all boils down to wiping up someone else's mess, dealing with attention-hungry clients, and recognising not to take it personally when faced with a 'toys being thrown out of pram' scenario. All bar the one difference that I am now notably without an expense account to alleviate the task at hand.
Then there are the clients. If you've ever watched the film Wall Street, being a stockbroker is nothing like that. There might be plenty of wannabe Gordon Gekkos, but for the vast majority, it's a desk job like any other - no overexcited hollering and fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants unscrupulous 'blue horse shoe' trade making. That's all pure artistic license Hollywood style. If anything, it's the clients, higher up on the food chain and on the other end of the phone, who make or break your day - and in a much more mundane way. These are the ones clutching the wallet and can choose to spend (or not) based on your stock recommendations. ("Might I suggest, sir, that today Stock X is looking mighty cheap, earnings were jolly buoyant at last count, and consolidation is rife in the sector, so it might get a boost from an imminent takeover, blah blah blah.") If they like it, you'll get an order, and the corresponding commission, and so forth.
The key to being a good stockbroker (and mother) is to pre-empt and meet your clients' (baby's) needs, thereby keeping them happy and your commission (mental state) healthy. So, it might go something like this: Is their portfolio a tad scant and needing some additions? Feed them a stock (substitute rusk, banana, rice cake or the like). Have they overloaded on risk and looking to scale back? Suggest they regurgitate a few stocks and help them deal with the mess (self-explanatory). Are they feeling grouchy and overtired? Stop hassling them and let them sleep. And so on. You get the picture.
So the irony is that despite a seeming role reversal, nothing has really changed. It all boils down to wiping up someone else's mess, dealing with attention-hungry clients, and recognising not to take it personally when faced with a 'toys being thrown out of pram' scenario. All bar the one difference that I am now notably without an expense account to alleviate the task at hand.



Mrs A is a soon to be ex-banker, currently on baby leave. She endured eight years in the City as a stockbroker before a timely exit to deal with matters of a maternal nature. Just as she began debating the merits of 'to return or not to return', the R word laid to rest that dilemma. Now she revels in the relative safety of being able to watch the credit crunch from the removed perspective of a civilian, while continuing to harbour her closet handbag habit. 






